First off, I am splitting the standings posts into AFC and NFC versions.
Secondly, I am adding some information to these posts. The basic information (W/L/T/Winning percentage) is still there of course, as is information that is relevant to tiebreakers (division and conference record, strength of victory and strength of schedule).
I have added information related to each team's Pythagorean record (it's a relationship of points scored and points allowed) and the strength of a team's remaining schedule. Why? The NFL season is so short that it can be hard to see differences between teams via their record alone. If Team A is 4-1 but has played bottom-feeders while winning each game by a field goal, and Team B is 3-2, but has played top teams and won going away, it's hard to see that in the standings. While this information is not at all material to who gets into the postseason, I believe it will help show relative team strength each week, which may help predict who gets the 12 postseason spots.
NFC
|
|||||||||||||||||
NFC
EAST
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
T
|
Pct
|
Conference
|
Division
|
SOV
|
SOS
|
PF
|
PA
|
Pythag%
|
RoS
SOS
|
||||
|
Philadelphia Eagles
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0.800
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.263
|
0.330
|
156
|
132
|
0.598
|
0.591
|
|
Dallas Cowboys
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0.800
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.363
|
0.410
|
135
|
103
|
0.655
|
0.518
|
|
New York Giants
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.400
|
0.510
|
133
|
111
|
0.606
|
0.527
|
|
Washington Redskins
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
0.200
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0.000
|
0.550
|
112
|
136
|
0.387
|
0.545
|
NFC
NORTH
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
T
|
Pct
|
Conference
|
Division
|
SOV
|
SOS
|
PF
|
PA
|
Pythag%
|
RoS
SOS
|
||||
|
Detroit Lions
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.467
|
0.520
|
99
|
79
|
0.631
|
0.459
|
|
Green Bay Packers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0.333
|
0.470
|
134
|
106
|
0.635
|
0.500
|
|
Minnesota Vikings
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0.400
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0.325
|
0.450
|
101
|
126
|
0.372
|
0.445
|
|
Chicago Bears
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0.400
|
1
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0.400
|
0.520
|
116
|
131
|
0.428
|
0.500
|
NFC
SOUTH
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
T
|
Pct
|
Conference
|
Division
|
SOV
|
SOS
|
PF
|
PA
|
Pythag%
|
RoS
SOS
|
||||
|
Carolina Panthers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.400
|
0.480
|
104
|
120
|
0.416
|
0.509
|
|
Atlanta Falcons
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0.400
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0.300
|
0.470
|
151
|
143
|
0.532
|
0.532
|
|
New Orleans Saints
|
2
|
3
|
0
|
0.400
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0.300
|
0.460
|
132
|
141
|
0.461
|
0.541
|
|
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
|
1
|
4
|
0
|
0.200
|
0
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
0
|
0.600
|
0.450
|
103
|
156
|
0.272
|
0.495
|
NFC
WEST
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
T
|
Pct
|
Conference
|
Division
|
SOV
|
SOS
|
PF
|
PA
|
Pythag%
|
RoS
SOS
|
||||
|
Arizona Cardinals
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0.750
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.667
|
0.688
|
86
|
86
|
0.500
|
0.483
|
|
Seattle Seahawks
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0.750
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.517
|
0.588
|
110
|
83
|
0.661
|
0.533
|
|
San Francisco 49ers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0.667
|
0.630
|
110
|
106
|
0.522
|
0.500
|
|
St. Louis Rams
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0.250
|
1
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.200
|
0.550
|
84
|
119
|
0.305
|
0.579
|
A quick primer on what all of this information is:
Team, W(ins), L(osses), T(ies), and Pct (winning percentage) are all self-explanatory.
The Conference and Division records are separated into separate columns for Wins/Losses/Ties. This was purely a formatting move designed to help me update the tables more efficiently.
PF - Points For (points scored by the team for the season)
PA - Points Against (points scored by the team's opponents for the season)
Pythag% - Pythagorean winning percentage - this is based on PF and PA
RoS SOS - Rest of Season Strength of Schedule
And, because we are a quarter of the way through the season (every team has now played at least 4 games), here are the current playoff standings for the conference:
NFC
|
|||||||||||||||||
CURRENT
PLAYOFF PICTURE
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Team
|
W
|
L
|
T
|
Pct
|
Conference
|
Division
|
SOV
|
SOS
|
PF
|
PA
|
Pythag%
|
RoS
SOS
|
||||
|
Philadelphia Eagles
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0.800
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.263
|
0.330
|
156
|
132
|
0.598
|
0.591
|
|
Arizona Cardinals
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0.750
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.667
|
0.688
|
86
|
86
|
0.500
|
0.483
|
|
Carolina Panthers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.400
|
0.480
|
104
|
120
|
0.416
|
0.509
|
|
Detroit Lions
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.467
|
0.520
|
99
|
79
|
0.631
|
0.459
|
|
Dallas Cowboys
|
4
|
1
|
0
|
0.800
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.363
|
0.410
|
135
|
103
|
0.655
|
0.518
|
|
Seattle Seahawks
|
3
|
1
|
0
|
0.750
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.517
|
0.588
|
110
|
83
|
0.661
|
0.533
|
|
San Francisco 49ers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0.667
|
0.630
|
110
|
106
|
0.522
|
0.500
|
|
New York Giants
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0.400
|
0.510
|
133
|
111
|
0.606
|
0.527
|
|
Green Bay Packers
|
3
|
2
|
0
|
0.600
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
0.333
|
0.470
|
134
|
106
|
0.635
|
0.500
|
Interesting bits of information:
- The Cardinals and 49ers see their schedules get considerably easier the remainder of the season.
- The Eagles and Cowboys have feasted on weak competition to this point, but their schedules will be much more difficult going forward. More alarmingly, the Saints will see their sechedule get stronger the rest of the way, and they are currently sitting on the wrong side of .500.
- The Redskins and Falcons both have stronger pythagorean winning percentages than their actual ones. This is mainly due to blowout wins over the Jaguars (Washington) and Buccaneers (Faclons).
- The Eagles, Cowboys, and Panthers are the beneficiaries of inflated records, if the pythagorean data is to be believed. In fact, the Panthers have the pythagorean win percentage of a sub-.500 team thanks to the fact that they have allowed more points than they have scored on the season.
No comments:
Post a Comment